After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures across Europe, new technologies are actually reviving these types of systems. From lie recognition tools examined at the line to a program for verifying documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technologies is being utilized in asylum applications. This article explores just how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into forced hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with unpredictable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their capacity to find the way these devices and to pursue their right for coverage.
It also shows how these technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They help in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering them from being able to access the channels of proper protection. It www.ascella-llc.com/generated-post further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms worth mentioning technologies, through which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who have are disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these systems have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double impact: when they aid to expedite the asylum process, they also help to make it difficult pertaining to refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions made by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, they will pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.